Judgments & Legal Resources
This directory brings together 11 records from the CRM judgment library on extradition, removal, INTERPOL and protection principles. Summaries identify research topics; consult the court text for the decision. CRJO Chinese notes are reference material.
1. INTERPOL CCF Decision CCF/119/R451.21
CCF/119/R451.21 · Commission for the Control of INTERPOL's Files
INTERPOL file deletion; political context and human-rights concerns.
English research report ↓ | CRM case analysis ↗
2. Liu v. Poland
Application no. 37610/18 · European Court of Human Rights
Extradition to China; detention conditions and risk assessment.
Archived original ↗ | CRJO Chinese reference note ↗ | Official court source ↗
3. M.A. and Others v. Bulgaria
Application no. 5115/18 · European Court of Human Rights
The case initially involved five Uyghur applicants. The first and fifth applicants were struck out; the Court held that removing the second, third and fourth applicants to China would violate Articles 2 and 3.
Archived original ↗ | CRJO Chinese reference note ↗ | Official court source ↗
4. A.L. (X.W.) v. Russia
Application no. 44095/14 · European Court of Human Rights
Forcible return to China; death-penalty risk and Articles 2 and 3.
Archived original ↗ | CRJO Chinese reference note ↗ | Official court source ↗
5. Y v. Russia
Application no. 20113/07 · European Court of Human Rights
Removal to China; Article 3 risk assessment.
Archived original ↗ | CRJO Chinese reference note ↗ | Official court source ↗
6. United States v. Burns
2001 SCC 7 · Supreme Court of Canada
Death-penalty assurances in extradition.
Archived original ↗ | CRJO Chinese reference note ↗ | Official court source ↗
7. B010 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
2015 SCC 58 · Supreme Court of Canada
Alleged assistance with irregular entry; eligibility for refugee protection.
Archived original ↗ | CRJO Chinese reference note ↗ | Official court source ↗
8. Soering v. the United Kingdom
Application no. 14038/88 · European Court of Human Rights
Extradition and risk of prohibited treatment in the receiving state.
9. Chahal v. the United Kingdom
Application no. 22414/93 · European Court of Human Rights
National security, torture and non-refoulement.
10. Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom
Application no. 8139/09 · European Court of Human Rights
Diplomatic assurances and risk of a flagrant denial of justice.
11. Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
2002 SCC 1 · Supreme Court of Canada
Deportation, torture risk and procedural fairness.
Full CRM judgment library ↗ | Legal instruments & conventions ↗